If you want to share this website
with your friends, classmates or family, click here
If you want your article to be published, it should the following:
- Relationship of the article with Cost Accounting
- Article source
The articles will be published only if they meet the prerequisites of quality and information.
The standard costs are developed
based on direct and indirect costs
standard cost is a measure of how much should cost to produce or
deliver a product or service. The
standard cost of a product is made of the costs of the components
required to produce that product. For example, the
standard cost of a leather jacket includes:
- Cost of materials (leather, zipper, buttons, etc.)
- Direct labor cost (the time required to cut the design, sew it, etcetera, at the rate of production of employees who work in the process), and
- Indirect manufacturing costs related to the product (depreciation of the skin cutter machine, electricity, rent of the factory, etc.).
Once the standard cost is established, this provides the basis for decision-making, to analyze and control costs, and to measure the inventory and the cost of goods sold (see valuation of inventories). The standard costs serve as a benchmark against which actual costs are compared. The differences between current costs and standard costs are called variances. The actual costs may differ from the standard costs due to differences in price, differences in quantity, errors, or other conditions. To determine the reasons for the variances a corrective action may be suggested or demonstrate that the products are currently costing more or less than the anticipated.
Example: Assume that our leather jacket contains an average of 2 meters of skin at a cost of $16.00 per meter, a zipper at a cost of $5.00 per meter and two buttons at a cost of $0.50 each. Based on a time study recently made by the administration, a jacket requires an average of 5 hours of time spent by an employee to be produced. The production workers are paid on average $10 per hour of work, including benefits. The standard cost for the direct costs (the one for indirect costs will be seen later in this section) shall be as follows:
Throughout the year, our leather jacket company will buy leather, zippers and buttons, and also recruit and pay to production employees. But what hill happened 1) if the company found skin at a lower price with a new supplier, which it is offering a discount, 2) a new machine has been acquired by the company to minimize the amount of material required by each jacket reducing the material scrap; 3) due to a very special order, the company had to ask their workers to work overtime, which must be paid on time and a half the normal rate, i.e. 150%; 4 ) the new machine to improved productivity, and now are used only 4.8 hours to produce a jacket. These differences will lead to variations between actual cost and standard costs budgeted as follows:
Now it's easy to see how jackets cost $5.00 more than what was budgeted. To understand a variance or variation, it must be analyzed and broken into its component parts. The analysis of variance in material would be:
The analysis of variance in direct labor would be the following:
The variance is added as follows:
The formulas to analyze variances can be expressed as follows:
The direct costs vary in relation to the volume of units produced. Overhead or indirect costs or general expenses, however, are elements that vary directly with the volume (variable costs) and other elements that do not (fixed costs).
Overhead Budgets. One way to budget the overhead is ignoring the indirect effects of volume. This approach is called fixed costs budget. Under this approach, the administration determines the amount of overhead that should be taken based on a desired or normal level of production. The total expenditure becomes the overhead budget against which performance is measured, regardless of the level of production currently achieved. An example of this would be as follows:
The performance at the end of the year may be measured against the total $3'600,000. However, not taking into account the true nature of costs, may lead to a manager to take inaccurate conclusions about the performance. For example, lets assume that this budget is based on a "normal" level of production of leather jackets (160,000 units). Also assume that the costs of electricity, accounting in part for cutting machines and sewing, vary with the level of production. So, if 200,000 jackets are produced during the year, the cost of electricity will exceed $800,000, say that these were a total of $1'000,000. Comparing this with a fixed budget, the manager can say that the supervisor of the warehouse did his job poorly in terms of managing the costs of electricity, when in fact, excessive spending is due solely to 40,000 extra jackets that occurred.
other approach for budgeting overhead is called flexible budget.
A flexible budget specifies a cost permissible at each possible level
of production. Once the period is
completed and the volume of production known, the standard budget is
determined by reference to flexible budget for the current level of
production. This is a parallel
method to the way used to
determine the budget for direct materials and manpower. Example
of a simplified flexible budget:
A flexible budget allows us to analyze in a more intelligent way the variable overhead.
Overhead absorption. Now that our
flexible budget is established, we need to establish how we are going
to allocate indirect costs to our products. The total cost of
a product should include all indirect costs that were generated to
bring the product to its complete form. So
apart from the direct labor and materials, the standard cost of a
product includes indirect costs as well. But, manpower and
materials are easy to measure and allocate their products. It
is much more difficult to
determine how much rent, indirect material, or depreciation was
consumed by a particular product.
In multi-product firms, it is necessary to use a different method or cost driver than the number of units produced, so a more fair distribution of indirect cost between products can be made. For example, if our company makes leather gloves in addition to jackets and gloves can be manufactured in a quarter of the time it takes to produce a jacket, it would be unfair to charge each pair of gloves the same indirect cost that is charged to each jacket. Some other method of utilization of capacity must be used, as the labor hours, the amount paid by workforce in currency (either dollars, pesos, quarters, etc.) or machine hours. The choice for a business in particular should be based on which variable is the one that best measures the level of utilization of capacity for that business. For example, the overall costs of machinery depreciation can be allocated based on the number of machine hours per product as a cost driver. The entire cost of supervision can be distributed using the direct labor hours as a cost driver.
Since our production process of jackets is just more intense in direct labor, we will use the monetary cost of labor as a method of allocation (in this example we will use as currency the U.S. dollars). Using the direct labor dollars, the standard cost of overhead for a jacket would be $0.45 for each dollar of direct labor ($3.6 million of budgeted indirect cost divided by the total $8.0 million of budgeted manpower). Then, for a jacket $22.50 would be applied by indirect cost ($50.00 dollars per jacket multiplied by the $0.45 rate of indirect cost per DL dollar). The total standard cost for a leather jacket would be as follows:
This would be the amount to be accumulated as inventory by each jacket produced. However, differences between the planned and actual volume will make a volume variance to emerge. The volume variance can be explain as follows:
If the plan was to produce 160,000 jackets and currently there were only 140,000, and if we assume that the $3.6 million in indirect costs are fixed and that at the end of the year we only have $3.15 million of absorption by finished product; if the actual costs were $3.6 million, that compared with the absorption have led to a volume variance of $450,000.
Paged created by Alfonso Salinas
All rights reserved. Copyright ©